Home / Langfuse alternative

Langfuse alternative

A Langfuse alternative built for debugging, not just dashboards

Langfuse is a strong, mature open-source observability dashboard. Langprobe shares the same open, self-hosted foundation and adds a layer Langfuse doesn't have: replay and an agent-native MCP debug loop.

Last updated: July 4, 2026

TL;DR

  • Langfuse and Langprobe are both open-source and self-hosted — this isn't an open-vs-closed comparison.
  • Langfuse excels as a tracing, eval, and prompt-management dashboard with a large, mature community.
  • Langprobe adds replay (edit → re-run against a real model → span-level diff + determinism verdict) and an agent-native REST/MCP surface — a debug loop, not just observability.
  • Both ingest OpenTelemetry OTLP/HTTP; migrating traces is straightforward.

Langprobe vs Langfuse at a glance

DimensionLangprobeLangfuse
LicenseApache-2.0 open sourceMIT open source
Self-hostingYes — docker composeYes — docker compose
Tracing & spansYesYes
Evals & datasetsYesYes
Prompt managementFocused on debuggingYes — mature
Community maturityNewerLarge, established
Replay (edit & re-run a broken run)Yes — span diff + determinismNo
Agent-native MCP debug loopYes — token-budgeted find/read/replay/diffDocs MCP + API; no replay loop
OpenTelemetry ingestionYes — OTLP/HTTPYes — OTLP/HTTP

Langfuse is a well-built product with a large community — if a mature dashboard with prompt management is your priority, it's an excellent choice. This page is about when a replay-first debugger fits better. See also LangSmith vs Langfuse.

Where Langprobe pulls ahead

Replay closes the loop

A dashboard tells you a run failed. Langprobe lets you fix it in place: edit the prompt, model, or tool config, re-run against a real model, and get a span-level diff plus a determinism verdict — so you know a fix is real, not a lucky sample. Observability ends at "what happened"; Langprobe continues to "what happens if I change this."

Agents debug agents

Langprobe's reads are token-budgeted, LLM-legible projections over REST and MCP. A 48k-token trace becomes a ~2k-token salient slice, so a coding agent can find → read → replay → diff without a human in the loop. The whole debug cycle is available as API calls.

Choose the right tool

Choose Langprobe if…

  • You want to edit and re-run broken runs, not just view them.
  • You need a determinism verdict to trust a fix.
  • You want agents/CI to drive debugging over MCP.
  • Replay and an agent-native loop matter more than prompt-management breadth.

Choose Langfuse if…

  • You want a mature, battle-tested observability dashboard today.
  • Prompt management and a large plugin/community ecosystem are priorities.
  • You're standardizing on a widely adopted MIT-licensed platform.
  • You don't need replay or an agent-native debug loop yet.

Frequently asked questions

How is Langprobe different from Langfuse?
Both are open-source, self-hosted observability platforms. Langfuse is a mature MIT-licensed dashboard for tracing, evals, and prompt management. Langprobe adds replay (edit → re-run against a real model → span diff + determinism verdict) and a token-budgeted agent-native MCP surface so an agent can debug an agent.
Is Langprobe open source like Langfuse?
Yes — Langprobe is Apache-2.0, Langfuse is MIT. Both are self-hosted and keep trace data in your infrastructure. The difference is the feature set, not the openness.
Can I use Langprobe with OpenTelemetry like Langfuse?
Yes. Langprobe ingests OTLP/HTTP and OpenInference instrumentors for CrewAI, DSPy, Pydantic AI, OpenAI Agents, LlamaIndex, LangChain, and bare providers.

Try replay on your own traces

Open source, in your VPC, Apache-2.0. Free to start.

Start self-hosting   Star on GitHub